Odale-Articles-Sudbury
From OttawaRasc
IMPACT CRATER EXPLORATIONS
by: Charles O'Dale
Sudbury Impact Structure
|
Introduction
While documenting the Sudbury Meteorite Crater from my airplane and from the ground, I realized that for a non-professional geologist the geographic features that state that “this area is a meteorite crater” are not obvious. For this reason the initial content of my article will be a geologic description of the remnants of the present day Sudbury Meteorite Crater (highlighted by the circle in this topographic image). I will also document the evidence stating that the anatomy of the Sudbury complex was formed as the result of a cosmic collision. In this way I hope to better explain my aerial and ground images of the crater.I want to thank Frank Brunton and James E. Mungall for their assistance and allowing me to quote from their published papers (listed at the end of this article).
The Sudbury Structure comprises a 200-250 km multi ring impact basin formed at 1.85 Ga. The core of the structure is elliptical, 60 x 30 km, containing a layered 2.5 km thick impact melt sheet, referred to as the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC). The SIC was formed by differentiation of the impact melt pool at the probable main contact point of the impactor.
Formation of the Crater
The Sudbury Structure is situated within a unique Geotectonic setting in northeastern Ontario, being sandwiched between:
- the Archean-age (>2.5 billion-year-old) Superior Geologic or Structural Province, situated to west and north of the structure, and;
- the Proterozoic-age (>1.9 billion-year-old) Southern Geologic or Structural Province Huronian Supergroup, deformed by the (1.9 billion –year-old) Penokean orogeny , and situated to west, south and east of the Sudbury Structure.
The boundary of the Proterozoic-age (~1 billion-year-old) Grenville Geologic Province presently lies approximately 10 km to southeast of the SIC. The Grenville orogeny occurred 800 million years after the Sudbury Crater was formed. The SW-NE trend of the Grenville Front Structural Zone, which delineates the northernmost margin of the Grenville Structural Province, is roughly parallel to the long-axis of the SIC. [Note 2]
Segments of the Crater
The Sudbury Structure is interpreted to represent the tectonized and deeply eroded remnant of a multi-ring or peak-ring impact basin (Stoffler et al). Approximately 4 km of erosion over the eons has obliterated the crater rim. Tectonism has possibly deformed the original crater into an ellipse. The subsequent metamorphism in the structure is tied to tectonic activity such as collision of continents and folding and thrusting up of crustal rocks. A zone of deformation (shatter cones and rock metamorphism) has been documented to 74 km from the SIC.
This geologic schematic of the Sudbury structure (courtesy of F. Brunton) illustrates the present day remnant of the Sudbury Meteorite Crater comprising of:- the surrounding brecciated footwall rocks of both the Superior and southern Structural Geologic Provinces extending up to 100 km away from the present-day position of the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC);
- the Sudbury Igneous Complex (that formed as a result of impact-triggered magmatism, or deep crustal melting); and
- the Sudbury Basin within the SIC, comprising rocks of the Whitewater Group (found only in the interior of the SIC). The Whitewater Group consists of the Onaping, Onwatin and Chelmsford Formations [Note 2].
The Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC)
Thick sheets of melted rocks line the bottom of many large meteor craters. Some of these impact melts are derived from the release of kinetic energy at impactor contact that is converted to heat. Also, rocks lying kilometers deep within Earth are often on the verge of melting but are prevented from doing so by the immense pressure from the weight of the material lying above them. A large impactor would blast away this weight, releasing the pressure on the buried rocks and causing the underlying minerals to melt.
The impact melts may not fully cool for hundreds of thousands of years. In the meantime, water from the environment and the heat from the newly exposed rocks can combine to form hydrothermal systems in the heavily fractured rocks in and around the crater. Scientists believe such warm mineral-rich venues could have played a role in the early development of life on Earth. (Science News: 3/9/02, p. 147) Evidence of the hydrothermal systems is documented in my ground tour.
The SIC is this type of large melt sheet produced from crustal melting resulting from a cosmic impact. The target rocks, which remained within the crater after the impact, ponded to form a sub horizontal sheet of magma and differentiated as it cooled. It is currently exposed as an elliptical 60 x 30 km, 2.5 km thick remnant of the original impact melt sheet and consists, from bottom to top, of inclusion-rich, in places ore-bearing, quartz diorite sub layer, norite, quartz gabbro, and granophyre layers, and, within the target rocks surrounding the SIC, the quartz dioritic offset dikes.
The Whitewater Group
The SIC is overlain by the 1.8 km thick Onaping Formation. It consists of impact melt breccia, suevite and reworked suevite from:
- Fall-back (collapse of the original crater) and Fall-out (impact debris) forming a 2 km post impact sediment over the SIC melt rock; and,
- Wash-in – post impact sediment (the impact happened in a shallow sea).
The rock fragments in the breccias of the Onaping Formation are from the impact target Archean and Proterozoic rocks of the Superior and Huronian Provinces of the Canadian Shield. [Note 2]
The Onaping Formation is covered by 600 metres of argillites and minor exhalative carbonates and cherts of the Onwatin formation. This formation occurred during a period of quiescence after the impact basin formation.
The end of this quiet period was signaled by the abrupt appearance of the 850 metre-thick siliciclastic turbidites (sedimentary deposits settled out of muddy water carrying particles of widely varying grade size caused by turbidity currents) of the Chelmsford Formation (Rousell, 1972, 1984), which have been interpreted as a flysch apron deposited in the foredeep ahead of an advancing late Penokean mountain front (Young et al. 2001).
AERIAL TOUR
The next series of images will document my aerial exploration the crater, first from the north outside of the SIC, and gradually working across the structure to the south. Most of my images were from approximately 2000 feet above the ground.
This area has the single largest magmatic nickel source in the world. The Creighton Deep Project is currently mining and actively exploring well below the 7500-ft. level, maintaining its status as the deepest working mine in the western hemisphere. The size of the underground workings at Creighton dwarfs all man-made structures on the surface of the Earth. The No. 9 vertical shaft is between 4-5 times higher than the CN Tower!
The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory is housed in a cavern as large as a 10-story building, in the deepest section of the Creighton Mine.
The 200-m-thick impact melts found within the Sudbury Crater are a treasure trove of minerals. More than $1 billion of metal ores including those bearing nickel, platinum, and copper are mined from the melts each year. Isotopic analyses show that the metals come from Earth's crust, not from the meteorite that fell from space. Before the impact melt solidified, the deep, thick blend of light silicates and dense metal ores—which didn't mix well with each other—separated into two layers, according to density, just like oil and vinegar do. This ancient segregation makes mining today much easier. [Note 2]
The hydrothermal system created by the Sudbury impact also dissolved minerals containing copper and other metals from a broad area and then concentrated them in rich veins. (Richard Grieve, Natural Resources Canada in Ottawa)
GROUND TOUR
The next series of images will document my ground tour of the Sudbury Meteorite Crater that was guided by geologist Frank Brunton. We started north-west of Windy Lake outside of the SIC in the country rock and worked our way south-east along highway 144 to the center of the crater. This route gives a most fascinating display of the changing geology throughout the SIC feature caused by the impactor.
Surrounding Brecciated Footwall Rocks
Midcrustal 2.4 to 3 billion year old migmatites (a rock that incorporates both metamorphic and igneous materials) of the Levack Gneiss Complex are found immediately outside of the north rim of the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC).
Most of the SB dikes dip vertically or steeply and apparently have no obvious preferred orientation with respect to the present shape of the Sudbury Structure.
Characteristics of the Sudbury Breccia:
- concentrated within 5 km of the SIC;
- formed by dynamic means during very rapid deformation. (e.g., post impact friction-induced melting during the extensive and very rapid deformation and brecciation of the footwall rocks);
- a two component rock consisting of a fine-grained to aphanitic matrix surrounding inclusions of host-rocks and minerals;
- comprised of mineral and rock fragments derived predominantly from wall rocks, set within a typically dark, microcrystalline to fine grained matrix, generated by grinding and frictional melting; and
- mostly associated with the 2.5 billion year old Matachewan dykes. In the immediate area of the shattered bedrock are samples of the Matachewan dykes.
Another terrestrial example of this type of breccia is found in the Vredefort meteorite crater in South Africa.
Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC)
Approximately 1 km south from Windy Lake is a hill containing the North Range lower zone of the SIC. This area experienced an instantaneous melt at impact 1.8 billion years ago. These salt and pepper coloured felsic norite rocks consist of medium course crystalline, igneous textured plagioclase containing white feldspar and dark pyroxenes & mica. The lower zone of the SIC is 500 metres thick.
Whitewater Group
Onaping Formation
Further into the structure is the Whitewater Group, a 1400 m thick section consisting of fall-back of the original country rocks that has been hydrothermally altered. Ground water had seeped into faults caused by the impact, the water boiled creating hot springs through the Whitewater Group.
The impact probably occurred in a shallow sea as there is evidence of water flow-back in the top layers of the Whitewater Group. The quantity of “breccia fall-back” specifies that the fall-back segment of the impact lasted a substantial amount of time (perhaps hours) before the appearance of the returning tsunami.
The size of the Sudbury structure implies that the hydrothermal venting continued for thousands of years after the impact. The rocks of the Whitewater Group comprise (oldest-to-youngest): initially glass-rich breccias of the Onaping Formation, carbonates and argillites of the Vermilion and Onwatin formations, and arkosic sandstones and wackes of the Chelmsford Formation [Note 2].
Bucky balls (soccer-ball-shaped molecules of 60 carbon atoms) possibly of extraterrestrial origin and with traces of helium and argon gas trapped inside were found in this breccia.
Chelmsford Formation
The Chelmsford Formation comprises about 850 metres of mostly wacke and siltstone, essentially sedimentary rocks deposited over the Whitewater Group after the impact. In the image note the ripples encased in the rock caused by water flowing back and forth. Paleocurrent studies indicate that the predominant flow direction was to the southwest, parallel to the long axis of the Sudbury Basin.
The controversy over the origin of the Sudbury Structure and the Sudbury Igneous Complex was ongoing before the beginning of mining in the area. My father was involved in the mining industry before the onset of WWII and he always thought that the structure was somehow involved with volcanic activity. I remember being in high school when my science teacher mentioned that he had recently read a paper hypothesizing that the Sudbury Structure may be the result of a meteorite impact. Also that it had happened long before any life had evolved to survive on land (evolution was not allowed to be taught in Ontario schools at that time!). I found this idea fascinating and I think that this was probably where my interest in meteorite craters originated.
The magnitude of scientific information describing the Sudbury Structure over the years has amplified my desire to fully explore this crater and others. This project was one of my lifelong dreams realized and I am still amazed at the magnitude of the “event” that created this structure.
Notes
- J.E. Mungall and J.J. Hanley: ORIGINS OF OUTLIERS OF THE HURONIAN SUPERGROUP WITHIN THE SUDBURY STRUCTURE. Department of Geology, University of Toronto.
- Frank Brunton: THE FACTS-SIGNIFICANCE OF SUDBURY GEOLOGY MINING HISTORY. This is Frank Brunton beside my chariot, C-GOZM immediately after our aerial exploration of the crater. Note the F18 in the right background. The Sudbury airport is on the east rim of the SIC and directly over the South Range Shear Zone.
- The close proximity of the Sudbury and Wanapitei impact structures is strictly coincidence. The Sudbury impact happened over 1.8 billion years before the one at Wanapitei. In another coincidence, relatively nearby in northern Quebec’s Canadian Shield, is another double impact site, the Clearwater East and Clearwater West impact structures. The Clearwater impacts, shown in this image, are related and simultaneously occurred 290 million years ago. Image courtesy of Earth Impact Database, 2003.
- Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution II, a major portion of the data quoted in this documentation of the Sudbury impact structure, was gleaned from this particular volume that contains many articles on the Sudbury Igneous Complex.
- In the Landsat image observe Lake Nipissing to the east of the Sudbury Structure. There are two circular features on Lake Nipissing whose geological features are unexplained. They are documented in the following two images taken from the north coast of the Lake Nipissing looking south. At the extreme east of Lake Nipissing, by the town of Callander, is a circular feature that resembles a caldera. In the eastern area of Lake Nipissing are the Manitou Islands, a series of small islands placed in the form of a circle. A third feature, a semicircular indentation into the north coast of Lake Nipissing at Meadowside, was probably caused by wave action erosion of the soft coast material.
References
Maddock, R.H., 1983. Melt origin offault-generated pseudotachylytes demonstrated by textures, Geology, Vol 11, no 2.
Philpotts, A.R. Origin of Pseudotachylites, American Journal of Science, Vol 262 1964.
